Mumbai: The historic convocation hall of Mumbai University echoed with spirited arguments on Friday as students from across Maharashtra gathered for the state-level finale of the 11th Speak for India debate competition. Yash Patil from Mumbai University’s Ambedkar Studies Department emerged as the winner. The second place went to Ashwin Kulkarni from Sandip University, Nashik.Organised by the Hormis Memorial Foundation of Federal Bank, in association with The Times of India and Maharashtra Times, the event saw young orators from 36 districts battle it out on contemporary social and economic issues. After multiple preliminary rounds involving over 100 participants, eight finalists advanced to the eliminator stage, where they showcased sharp analytical thinking and quick-witted rebuttals.
The first eliminator focused on whether the gig economy is the definitive answer to unemployment. Mumbai’s Parth Dalvi spoke in favour, highlighting the “freedom” and “immediate earning potential” it offers those unable to wait for traditional recruitment cycles. However, Ganesh Raut from Amravati countered that unchecked market forces lead to the “exploitation of labour”, arguing that a demographic dividend should not result in mere “cheap labour”.Yash Chavan of Pune added historical context, noting that gig work has existed long before digital apps — seen in migrant farm workers and touring musicians — while Kulkarni warned that with AI and drone deliveries on the horizon, the focus must shift toward future-ready skill building.The second round shifted the focus to technology, debating whether a minimum legal age should be set for the use of AI tools. Shaunaq Shirgaonkar from Pune argued that unrestricted access encourages “mental laziness” and hampers creativity by providing the path of least resistance. Ananya Kundetkar of Mumbai dismissed the idea as “impractical,” comparing an AI ban for minors to “creating a fence in the ocean.” Adding to the cautionary side, Patil expressed fear that AI could rob children of their imagination and innocence, while Kanishk Upadhyay maintained that the tool’s impact rests solely on how parents and users regulate it.For the grand finale, judges selected Patil and Kulkarni. They debated the high-stakes motion: ‘Should women athletes be paid the same as their male counterparts?’Patil championed the cause of equal pay, citing the equal effort, equal and sacrifices women make in representing the nation with pride. Kulkarni countered with a market-based perspective, stating that in an entertainment-driven industry, remuneration depends on revenue models stating that there are some sports like ice skating where men make much less money compared to women. Sport and remuneration are about financial returns rather than social equality.The event was graced by badminton icon and Olympic medalist Saina Nehwal, who motivated the crowd by sharing her journey of grit. “From the age of 10, I cut off many things to become a champion,” she said, while also highlighting the need for psychological support for athletes, citing China’s investment in mental health training.Chief guest and BMC municipal commissioner Bhushan Gagrani lauded the power of oratory, stating, “You may find a warrior among a hundred, you may find an administrator among a thousand, but you will scarcely find a great speaker who can who can not only orate well but convince others of an idea.”Senior vice-president of Federal Bank Rathna Mala L V said: “Giving back to society and youth welfare is our goal in this endeavor which aims to find the next great speaking prodigy out there.”As the audience waited in anticipation Patil was announced the winner of the 11th edition of the Speak for India event among great laurels, celebrations, and selfie requests heaped upon the young lad. Patil credited his win to just one word “self-confidence”.Kulkarni, the runner-up, when asked what was the reason his opponent triumphed, said: “When the eliminator deliberations were still going on, he started preparing before anyone paying no heed to the fact he may not be selected for the finals.”
